Rovio is
currently IPOing to the Helsinki stock exchange. Taking part in IPOs has been
quite lucrative in the near past, so I’m definitely interested! I read Rovio’s
IPO prospectus and will publish my notes here. The format ain’t too polished
but here goes.
Stock and IPO basics
Stock:
Number of
stocks total currently = 75.3 million
Number of
new stocks being issued = 2.7 million
Number of
stocks after IPO = 78.0 million
Stock sellers
get 373 million euro (=exit). Rovio gets 30 million euro only from stock
issuance.
Number of
stocks offered to general public = 2 million (minimum is 100 stocks so 20k
investors with minimum would do it)
Number of
stocks offered to institutions = 35.2 million (~95% of stocks are going to
institutions)
..of which
institutions’ already committed number of stocks = 20.2 million (15 million
stocks up for grabs)
Dates:
IPO ends Tuesday 25th of September at 16:00
Results of IPO out 28th of September
Trading commences on 29th of September at pre-list and 3rd of October on main list
Key numbers from end of H1 2017 (trailing 12 months):
Income
statement:
Revenue 266
million (=S)
Operating
income 29.5 million (=EBIT)
Net income
20.3 million (=E)
Cash flow
statement:
Cash flow from
operations 40.8 million (=CFFO)
Balance
sheet:
Cash 44.9
million
Debt 50.0
million
Debt/CFFO =
1.2
Total assets
147 million (=B)
Net gearing
-35% (=no net debt)
Profitability and valuation
EPS for H1
2017 (6 months) = 0.18 euro = low
EBIT margin
14%
ROE ttm 31%
low end of scale
10.25 euros per stock -> Market cap = 800 million (=P)
high end of
scale 11.50 euros per stock -> Market cap = 897 million (=P)
P/B = 5.4 –
6.1
P/E = 39 –
44
P/S = 3.0 –
3.4
P/CFFO = 20
– 22
Other considerations
Future: Mobile
gaming estimated to be growing at 14% through 2020.
No major
operative risks being seen: Second movie is produced by Sony, not Rovio.
Number of
personnel is reduced to less than half of peak (848 -> 376) (=lean).
Operations
seem quite professional but still somewhat of a “one hit wonder”.
Leadership
team (execs and board) all have skin in the game in the company via stocks
and/or options.
Growth in
previous months is very high but the sustainability of such growth seems
unlikely.
Rovio leadership’s guidance for H2 2017 is “significant EBITDA increase […] Over 10% is considered ‘significant’”
Conclusions
One thing
holding me back is my personal disinterest in engaging in Rovio’s games. In the
reports one can see that the monthly average revenue per paying user (=MARPPU,
one of Rovio’s KPIs) is over 30 euros is stunningly mind-boggling to me! Also,
the Angry bird brand seems a bit past is Best before date, but that’s not the
worst part.
The
valuation is too damn high! ..But I may still try and juicy a couple of euros
from “greater fools” by partaking in the IPO with a very short term outlook.
Another strategy I’m pondering is abstaining for now, checking how the stocks
opens in the first minutes of trading and try and do some “play moves” then.
Happy
trading!
The valuation of every listing company is too high currently. It is a bit concerning by itself. Nevertheless, I see a future for Rovio. They are starting to figure out how to make profits without angrybirds even if it still is a big part of their income.
ReplyDeleteYeah, that is true. The full details on Terveystalo's IPO aren't available yet but it was also speculated to be quite expensively valued. A surge of overdue and overvalued IPOs is in my opinion an indication of the phase of the market :) Happy trading! -Jukka
Delete